![]() The main point is to no longer have all these texts of “let ring” at each measure when we import the GP files.īut to get something in the spirit of our ottava lines (“let ring” at first, then a dotted line) And the same thing for the Palm Mute (P.M.) To conclude, I do not think we should worry about these questions of voices and strings (in the real life, not a problem, and for GP, a tool for the playback, for "internal use", in my comprehension still). 3rd system: as it should be written! In two or three voices, and so, in order to get the right notes duration of this arpeggio without going through this "solution of ease" of “let ring” 2nd system: as it does then, for the playback, by adding “let ring” on some melodic notes, or/and for the bass line (and sometime, with some inconsistencies!) 1st system: as the user of GP writes these measures (all in voice 1) So, no matter either again here.įrom this GP file: green_day_wake_me_up_when_september_ends.gp5 (see first measures, and measure 7 in particular) I discover that I can use a pedal line (with playback) in a guitar score :) But since this is never used in the guitar repertoire, never the utility!Īccording to what I see, the average user of GP (or rather in some music styles, let’s say rock music), so, this user employes essentially the voice 1 (simpler, faster, probably,)Īnd then, he “cheats” by using abundantly this tool “let ring”, in order to obtain in the playback the sustained effect of an arpeggio.īut this could also be done in voice 2, or other.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |